Fueling Canine Happiness Exploring the Impact of River Run Pet Food
River Run Dog Food Review
River run dog food is one of the best choices when it comes to providing your dog with a diet that is both nutritious and healthy. You will need to know a few things before choosing this particular type of dog food. You will need to know the ingredients and the source of the meat. You will also want to make sure you read the labels. This is important because you dont want to feed your dog something that has unknown ingredients.
Meat source
The River Run dog food line offers five dry formulas. Each of the dog food offerings has its own set of ingredients. Each recipe is designed to meet the specific needs of a particular breed of dog. For example, the Hi-Energy Formula 24-20 Dog Food is made with a mix of multiple carbohydrate sources. The Puppy Formula 28-18 Dog Food is specially formulated to meet the needs of puppies. This formula is a soy-free dog food.
The River Run dog food line is not without its flaws. Some of the products contain low quality ingredients. For instance, the adult formula 21-10 Dog Food does not contain a good amount of Omega 3 and 6 fatty acids. The company also uses unnamed meat sources, which can be a cause for concern. Likewise, some of the ingredients are sourced from countries outside of the U.S. Lastly, some of the ingredients may be cheap and low-quality.
Meat by-products
River Run dog food is a private label brand offered by a pet food manufacturer. It offers a wide variety of products and recipes to meet the nutritional needs of different dogs at various stages of their lives.
Some of the formulas on the River Run brand may include meat by-products. While these products may be nutritious for your pet, they can also cause allergies and sensitivity. It is best to contact the company if you are concerned about these ingredients.
By-products are typically the leftovers of human food production. They contain bones, organs, and other components not used by humans. They are processed into a uniform size and used as a source of protein. They are also cooked to destroy bacteria.
Some companies, like Blue Buffalo, do not use any meat by-products in their products. Other brands, like Flint River Ranch, are made of whole grains and have no by-products.
Canine nutrition
River Run dog food has a lot of different recipes that have varying levels of nutrition. They have a recipe that is designed to give puppies energy and a healthy coat, and they have a formula that is designed to give working dogs the right amounts of nutrients to keep them strong and healthy. These ingredients are also made for different stages of a dogs life, so youll have to pick which one is best for your pet.
The first ingredient in the River Run dog food nutrition list is meat and bone meal. While this is not a great ingredient for your pet, it does mean that the food contains some quality protein. The second ingredient is whole ground corn, and the third is corn gluten meal. The fourth ingredient is animal fat, which helps provide your dog with energy and helps maintain a healthy coat.
The last ingredient is sugar, which can cause digestive problems for your dog. Although the formula is made for a working dog, the amount of sugar in it is too much for most pets. A better option would be to feed your pet a product that includes less sugar and more protein.
Ingredients
River Run dog food contains a large number of ingredients. These include high-quality protein, whole grains, fruits and vegetables, prebiotics and probiotics. The products are designed to meet the needs of different breeds and life stages.
River Run Adult Formula 21-10 Dog Food is a nutritionally balanced diet for puppies and adult dogs. It has an average protein level of 21%, which helps with muscle development and weight loss. It also has balanced fiber that promotes healthy digestion. Besides protein, it has vitamins and minerals that support daily strength and health. This diet is perfect for dogs that have a dry coat and a normal activity level.
River Run Puppy Food is a low-fat diet that is designed to provide protein and energy for puppies. It is soy-free and offers building blocks for healthy pups. It has large quantities of corn and grain to provide energy for growing pups.
Unlocking Consumer Choices in the Digital Economy: Exploring Factors Influencing Online and Offline Purchases in the Emerging Pet Food Market
Abbate, T., Codini, A., Aquilani, B., & Vrontis, D. (2022). From knowledge ecosystems to capabilities ecosystems: when open innovation digital platforms lead to value co-creation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, 290304.
Article Google Scholar
Agwu, M. E., & Onwuegbuzie, H. N. (2018). Effects of international marketing environments on entrepreneurship development. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 12.
Article Google Scholar
Ahmad, A. H., Fauzi, R. U. A., Ditta, A. S. A., Idris, I., & Yazid, M. F. M. (2020). The role of perceived benefits and perceived risks towards the consumers purchase intention via Ecommerce: an evidence from Indonesia. Solid State Technology, 63(2s), 32573274.
Google Scholar
Akpan, I. J., Udoh, E. A. P., & Adebisi, B. (2022). Small business awareness and adoption of state-of-the-art technologies in emerging and developing markets, and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 34(2), 123140.
Article Google Scholar
Alexieva, B. (2016). There must be some system in this madness: metaphor, polysemy, and wordplay in a cognitive linguistics framework. InTraductio (pp. 137154). Routledge.
Google Scholar
Alimamy, S., & Gnoth, J. (2022). I want it my way! The effect of perceptions of personalization through augmented reality and online shopping on customer intentions to co-create value. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107105.
Article Google Scholar
Alzoubi, H., Alshurideh, M., Kurdi, B., Akour, I., & Aziz, R. (2022). Does BLE technology contribute towards improving marketing strategies, customers satisfaction and loyalty? The role of open innovation. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(2), 449460.
Article Google Scholar
Aragunde-Kohl, U., Gmez-Galn, J., Lzaro-Prez, C., & Martnez-Lpez, J. . (2020). Interaction and emotional connection with pets: a descriptive analysis from Puerto Rico. Animals, 10(11), 2136.
Article Google Scholar
Banton, S., Baynham, A., Pezzali, J. G., von Massow, M., & Shoveller, A. K. (2021). Grains on the brain: a survey of dog owner purchasing habits related to grain-free dry dog foods. PLoS ONE, 16(5), e0250806.
Article Google Scholar
Barcelos, A. M., Kargas, N., Packham, C., & Mills, D. S. (2021). Understanding the impact of dog ownership on autistic adults: implications for mental health and suicide prevention. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 23655.
Article Google Scholar
Batrancea, L. M., Nichita, A., & Cocis, A. D. (2022). Financial performance and sustainable corporate reputation: empirical evidence from the airline business. Sustainability, 14(20), 13567.
Article Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78117.
Article Google Scholar
Bilal, M., Mehmood, T., Nadeem, F., Barbosa, A. M., de Souza, R. L., Pompeu, G. B., ... & Iqbal, H. M. (2022). Enzyme-assisted transformation of lignin-based food bio-residues into high-value products with a zero-waste theme: a review.Waste and Biomass Valorization, 118.
Brandes, S. (2009). The meaning of American pet cemetery gravestones.Ethnology: An International Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology,48(2), 99118.
Bussolari, C. J., Habarth, J., Katz, R., Phillips, S., Carmack, B., & Packman, W. (2018). The euthanasia decision-making process: a qualitative exploration of bereaved companion animal owners. Bereavement Care, 37(3), 101108.
Article Google Scholar
Carayannis, E. G., Dezi, L., Gregori, G., & Calo, E. (2022). Smart environments and techno-centric and human-centric innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: a quintuple helix innovation system view towards smart, sustainable, and inclusive solutions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, 926955.
Article Google Scholar
Castelo-Branco, I., Cruz-Jesus, F., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing: evidence for the European Union. Computers in Industry, 107, 2232.
Article Google Scholar
Chavez, R., Yu, W., Feng, M., & Wiengarten, F. (2016). The effect of customer-centric green supply chain management on operational performance and customer satisfaction. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 205220.
Article Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Lu, Y., Bulysheva, L., & Kataev, M. Y. (2022b). Applications of blockchain in industry 4.0: a review.Information Systems Frontiers, 115.
Chen, N., Sun, D., & Chen, J. (2022a). Digital transformation, labour share, and industrial heterogeneity. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), 100173.
Article Google Scholar
Cho, M., Bonn, M. A., & Li, J. J. (2019). Differences in perceptions about food delivery apps between single-person and multi-person households. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 108116.
Article Google Scholar
Cowan, R. S. (2023).More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. Plunkett Lake Press.
Dalton, K. R., Rock, C., Carroll, K. C., & Davis, M. F. (2020). One Health in hospitals: How understanding the dynamics of people, animals, and the hospital built-environment can be used to better inform interventions for antimicrobial-resistant gram-positive infections. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 9, 117.
Article Google Scholar
Dant, R. P., & Jin (Jean) Jeon, H., Mumdziev, N., & Windsperger, J. (2016). A cross-national comparison of brand perceptions of global franchise chains in the BRICS. Journal of Marketing Channels, 23(4), 196216.
Article Google Scholar
Dong, H., Wang, H., & Han, J. (2022). Understanding ecological agricultural technology adoption in China using an integrated technology acceptance modeltheory of planned behavior model. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 927668.
Article Google Scholar
Driscoll, C. A., Macdonald, D. W., & OBrien, S. J. (2009). From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,106(supplement_1), 99719978.
Escursell, S., Llorach-Massana, P., & Roncero, M. B. (2021). Sustainability in e-commerce packaging: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124314.
Article Google Scholar
Felix, R., Gonzalez, E. M., Castano, R., Carrete, L., & Gretz, R. T. (2022). When the green in green packaging backfires: gender effects and perceived masculinity of environmentally friendly products. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(3), 925943.
Article Google Scholar
Feng, J. Y., Mu, W., & Fu, Z. (2006). A review of consumers purchase intention research. Modern Management Science, 11, 79.
Google Scholar
Fernndez-i-Marn, X., Hurka, S., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2022). Systemic dynamics of policy change: overcoming some blind spots of punctuated equilibrium theory. Policy Studies Journal, 50(3), 527552.
Article Google Scholar
Flores-Hernndez, J. A., Cambra-Fierro, J. J., & Vzquez-Carrasco, R. (2020). Sustainability, brand image, reputation and financial value: manager perceptions in an emerging economy context. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 935945.
Article Google Scholar
Foxall, G. R. (2018). Consumer behavior analysis and the marketing firm: Bilateral contingency in the context of environmental concern. InLeadership and Cultural Change(pp. 97122). Routledge.
Gabaix, X. (2019). Behavioral inattention. InHandbook of behavioral economics: Applications and foundations 1(Vol. 2, pp. 261343). North-Holland.
Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2018). Prospects and challenges of sharing economy for the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 7787.
Article Google Scholar
Gao, L., & Waechter, K. A. (2017). Examining the role of initial trust in user adoption of mobile payment services: an empirical investigation. Information Systems Frontiers, 19, 525548.
Article Google Scholar
Grigorescu, A., & Ion, A. E. (2022). Qualitative analysis of sustainability and innovation within the luxury business sector. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(4), 31503171.
Article Google Scholar
Groening, C., Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Green marketing consumer-level theory review: a compendium of applied theories and further research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 18481866.
Article Google Scholar
Gupta, S., & Ramachandran, D. (2021). Emerging market retail: transitioning from a product-centric to a customer-centric approach. Journal of Retailing, 97(4), 597620.
Article Google Scholar
Han, R., Shin, J. T., Kim, J., Choi, Y. S., & Kim, Y. W. (2017). An overview of the South Korean edible insect food industry: challenges and future pricing/promotion strategies. Entomological Research, 47(3), 141151.
Article Google Scholar
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 11591197.
Article Google Scholar
Heinberg, M., Ozkaya, H. E., & Taube, M. (2018). Do corporate image and reputation drive brand equity in India and China? -Similarities and differences. Journal of Business Research, 86, 259268.
Article Google Scholar
Hidayat, K., & Idrus, M. I. (2023). The effect of relationship marketing towards switching barrier, customer satisfaction, and customer trust on bank customers. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 116.
Article Google Scholar
Hutt, M. D., & Speh, T. W. (2021). Business marketing management: B2B. Cengage Learning.
Google Scholar
Khn, F., Lichters, M., & Krey, N. (2020). The touchy issue of produce: Need for touch in online grocery retailing. Journal of Business Research, 117, 244255.
Article Google Scholar
Lazaroiu, G., Andronie, M., U, C., & Hurloiu, I. (2019). Trust management in organic agriculture: Sustainable consumption behavior, environmentally conscious purchase intention, and healthy food choices. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, 340.
Article Google Scholar
Lee, L. H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., ... & Hui, P. (2021). All one needs to know about metaverse: a complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05352.
Lee, S. Y., Zhang, W., & Abitbol, A. (2019). What makes CSR communication lead to CSR participation? Testing the mediating effects of CSR associations, CSR credibility, and organizationpublic relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 413429.
Article Google Scholar
Lee, Y. C., Wang, Y. C., Lu, S. C., Hsieh, Y. F., Chien, C. H., Tsai, S. B., & Dong, W. (2016). An empirical research on customer satisfaction study: a consideration of different levels of performance. Springerplus, 5(1), 19.
Article Google Scholar
Liao, C., Lin, H. N., Luo, M. M., & Chea, S. (2017). Factors influencing online shoppers repurchase intentions: the roles of satisfaction and regret. Information & Management, 54(5), 651668.
Article Google Scholar
Liu, H., Chen, H., Hong, R., Liu, H., & You, W. (2020). Mapping knowledge structure and research trends of emergency evacuation studies. Safety Science, 121, 348361.
Article Google Scholar
Lockwood, J. L., Welbourne, D. J., Romagosa, C. M., Cassey, P., Mandrak, N. E., Strecker, A., ... & Keller, R. (2019). When pets become pests: the role of the exotic pet trade in producing invasive vertebrate animals.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,17(6), 323330.
Maddox, J. (2021). The secret life of pet Instagram accounts: joy, resistance, and commodification in the internets cute economy. New Media & Society, 23(11), 33323348.
Article Google Scholar
Meng, B., Zhang, X., Hua, W., Liu, L., & Ma, K. (2022). Development and application of phase change material in fresh e-commerce cold chain logistics: a review. Journal of Energy Storage, 55, 105373.
Article Google Scholar
Moon, Y., & Armstrong, D. J. (2020). Service quality factors affecting customer attitudes in online-to-offline commerce. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 18(1), 134.
Article Google Scholar
Nanda, A., Xu, Y., & Zhang, F. (2021). How would the COVID-19 pandemic reshape retail real estate and high streets through acceleration of E-commerce and digitalization? Journal of Urban Management, 10(2), 110124.
Article Google Scholar
Natarajan, T., Balasubramanian, S. A., & Kasilingam, D. L. (2017). Understanding the intention to use mobile shopping applications and its influence on price sensitivity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37, 822.
Article Google Scholar
Neger, M., & Uddin, B. (2020). Factors affecting consumers internet shopping behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Bangladesh. Chinese Business Review, 19(3), 91104.
Google Scholar
Ng, Z., Griffin, T. C., & Braun, L. (2021). The new status quo: enhancing access to humananimal interactions to alleviate social isolation & loneliness in the time of COVID-19. Animals, 11(10), 2769.
Article Google Scholar
Nijkamp, P., & Kourtit, K. (2013). The new urban Europe: Global challenges and local responses in the urban century. European Planning Studies, 21(3), 291315.
Article Google Scholar
Oakley, M., Mohun Himmelweit, S., Leinster, P., & Casado, M. R. (2020). Protection motivation theory: a proposed theoretical extension and moving beyond rationalityThe case of flooding. Water, 12(7), 1848.
Article Google Scholar
Oghazi, P., Karlsson, S., Hellstrm, D., & Hjort, K. (2018). Online purchase return policy leniency and purchase decision: mediating role of consumer trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 190200.
Article Google Scholar
Oke, A., Ladas, J., & Bailey, M. (2020). Ethical consumers: an exploratory investigation of the ethical food consumption behaviour of young adults in the North East of Scotland. British Food Journal, 122(11), 36233638.
Article Google Scholar
Oppong, S. A., Yen, D. C., & Merhout, J. W. (2005). A new strategy for harnessing knowledge management in e-commerce. Technology in Society, 27(3), 413435.
Article Google Scholar
Pappas, I. O., Kourouthanassis, P. E., Giannakos, M. N., & Lekakos, G. (2017). The interplay of online shopping motivations and experiential factors on personalized e-commerce: a complexity theory approach. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 730742.
Article Google Scholar
Porpino, G., Parente, J., & Wansink, B. (2015). Food waste paradox: antecedents of food disposal in low income households. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(6), 619629.
Article Google Scholar
Rajamannar, R. (2021).Quantum marketing: Mastering the new marketing mindset for tomorrows consumers. HarperCollins Leadership.
Ramanathan, U., Subramanian, N., & Parrott, G. (2017). Role of social media in retail network operations and marketing to enhance customer satisfaction. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(1), 105123.
Article Google Scholar
Reinartz, W., Wiegand, N., & Imschloss, M. (2019). The impact of digital transformation on the retailing value chain. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(3), 350366.
Article Google Scholar
Riccioli, F., Moruzzo, R., Zhang, Z., Zhao, J., Tang, Y., Tinacci, L., ... & Guidi, A. (2020). Willingness to pay in main cities of Zhejiang province (China) for quality and safety in food market.Food Control,108, 106831.
Rodriguez, K. E., Herzog, H., & Gee, N. R. (2021). Variability in human-animal interaction research. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 619600.
Article Google Scholar
Roth, A. V., Tsay, A. A., Pullman, M. E., & Gray, J. V. (2008). Unraveling the food supply chain: strategic insights from China and the 2007 recalls. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(1), 2239.
Article Google Scholar
Saegerman, C., Bianchini, J., Renault, V., Haddad, N., & Humblet, M. F. (2021). First expert elicitation of knowledge on drivers of emergence of the COVID-19 in pets. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 68(2), 626636.
Article Google Scholar
Samboko, P. C., Zulu-Mbata, O., & Chapoto, A. (2018). Analysis of the animal feed to poultry value chain in Zambia. Development Southern Africa, 35(3), 351368.
Article Google Scholar
Sang, Y., & Han, E. (2023). A win-win way for corporate and stakeholders to achieve sustainable development: Corporate social responsibility value co-creation scale development and validation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 11771190.
Article Google Scholar
Sarc, R., Curtis, A., Kandlbauer, L., Khodier, K., Lorber, K. E., & Pomberger, R. (2019). Digitalisation and intelligent robotics in value chain of circular economy oriented waste managementA review. Waste Management, 95, 476492.
Article Google Scholar
Schau, H. J. (2018). Identity projects and the marketplace.Consumer culture theory, 1939.
Serumaga, B., Ross-Degnan, D., Avery, A. J., Elliott, R. A., Majumdar, S. R., Zhang, F., & Soumerai, S. B. (2011). Effect of pay for performance on the management and outcomes of hypertension in the United Kingdom: Interrupted time series study.Bmj,342.
Sewpersadh, N. S. (2023). Disruptive business value models in the digital era. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 127.
Article Google Scholar
Shah, S. Z. A., Ahmad, M., & Mahmood, F. (2018). Heuristic biases in investment decision-making and perceived market efficiency: a survey at the Pakistan stock exchange. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 10(1), 85110.
Article Google Scholar
Shaw, S. D., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2018). The neuropsychology of consumer behavior and marketing. Consumer Psychology Review, 1(1), 2240.
Article Google Scholar
Sheppard, V. A., & Fennell, D. A. (2019). Progress in tourism public sector policy: toward an ethic for non-human animals. Tourism Management, 73, 134142.
Article Google Scholar
Sheth, S., & Kim, J. (2017). Social media marketing: The effect of information sharing, entertainment, emotional connection and peer pressure on the attitude and purchase intentions.GSTF Journal on Business Review (GBR),5(1).
Siddiqui, S. A., Zannou, O., Karim, I., Kasmiati, A., & N. M., Goaszewski, J., & Smetana, S. (2022). Avoiding food neophobia and increasing consumer acceptance of new food trendsA decade of research. Sustainability, 14(16), 10391.
Article Google Scholar
Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subi, J., & Nancu, D. (2020). Influences of the Industry 4.0 revolution on the human capital development and consumer behavior: a systematic review.Sustainability,12(10), 4035.
Simon, M., VAn Den DriesT, F., & Wilms, T. O. M. (2016). Driving customer-centric growth: a practical roadmap: the pivotal role of insights and analytics in the customer-centric organization. Journal of Advertising Research, 56(2), 159168.
Article Google Scholar
Smith, M., Lal, P., Oluoch, S., Vedwan, N., & Smith, A. (2021). Valuation of sustainable attributes of hard apple cider: a best-worst choice approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128478.
Article Google Scholar
Srivastava, A., & Kumar, V. (2021). Hotel attributes and overall customer satisfaction: What did COVID-19 change? Tourism Management Perspectives, 40, 100867.
Article Google Scholar
Steenkamp, J. B. (2017).Global brand strategy: World-wise marketing in the age of branding. Springer.
Stouthuysen, K., Teunis, I., Reusen, E., & Slabbinck, H. (2018). Initial trust and intentions to buy: the effect of vendor-specific guarantees, customer reviews and the role of online shopping experience. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 27, 2338.
Article Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Luo, B., Wang, S., & Fang, W. (2021). What you see is meaningful: does green advertising change the intentions of consumers to purchase eco-labeled products? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 694704.
Article Google Scholar
Sundararajan, A. (2017).The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. MIT Press.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 13671387.
Article Google Scholar
Teubner, T., & Hawlitschek, F. (2018). The economics of peer-to-peer online sharing.The rise of the sharing economy: Exploring the challenges and opportunities of collaborative consumption, 129156.
Tlili, A., Altinay, F., Altinay, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Envisioning the future of technology integration for accessible hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(12), 44604482.
Article Google Scholar
Todeschini, B. V., Cortimiglia, M. N., Callegaro-de-Menezes, D., & Ghezzi, A. (2017). Innovative and sustainable business models in the fashion industry: entrepreneurial drivers, opportunities, and challenges. Business Horizons, 60(6), 759770.
Article Google Scholar
Toll, K., Spark, L., Neo, B., Norman, R., Elliott, S., Wells, L., ... & Robinson, S. (2022). Consumer preferences, experiences, and attitudes towards telehealth: qualitative evidence from Australia.PLoS One,17(8), e0273935.
Tran, V. D., & Vu, Q. H. (2019). Inspecting the relationship among E-service quality, E-trust, E-customer satisfaction and behavioral intentions of online shopping customers. Global Business & Finance Review (GBFR), 24(3), 2942.
Article Google Scholar
Turnock, L., & Gibbs, N. (2023). Click, click, buy: The market for novel synthetic peptide hormones on mainstream e-commerce platforms in the UK. Performance Enhancement & Health, 11(2), 100251.
Article Google Scholar
Turow, J. (2021). The voice catchers: How marketers listen in to exploit your feelings, your privacy, and your wallet. Yale University Press.
Book Google Scholar
Twum, K. K., & Nimako, R. K. (2022). Communicating corporate social responsibility initiatives: a focus on COVID-19.Marketing Communications in Emerging Economies, Volume II: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Evidence, 93123.
Van Riel, C. B., & Fombrun, C. J. (2007).Essentials of corporate communication: Implementing practices for effective reputation management. Routledge.
Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 118.
Article Google Scholar
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889901.
Article Google Scholar
Vigolo, V., Sallaku, R., & Testa, F. (2018). Drivers and barriers to clean cooking: a systematic literature review from a consumer behavior perspective. Sustainability, 10(11), 4322.
Article Google Scholar
Vinassa, M., Vergnano, D., Valle, E., Giribaldi, M., Nery, J., Prola, L., ... & Schiavone, A. (2020). Profiling Italian cat and dog owners perceptions of pet food quality traits.BMC veterinary research,16, 110.
Wang, J., & Hsu, Y. (2019). Does sustainable perceived value play a key role in the purchase intention driven by product aesthetics? Taking Smartwatch as an Example. Sustainability, 11(23), 6806.
Google Scholar
Wei, Y., Wang, C., Zhu, S., Xue, H., & Chen, F. (2018). Online purchase intention of fruits: antecedents in an integrated model based on technology acceptance model and perceived risk theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1521.
Article Google Scholar
White, K., Lin, L., Dahl, D. W., & Ritchie, R. J. (2016). When do consumers avoid imperfections? Superficial packaging damage as a contamination cue. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(1), 110123.
Article Google Scholar
Wiederhold, M., & Martinez, L. F. (2018). Ethical consumer behaviour in Germany: the attitude-behaviour gap in the green apparel industry. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(4), 419429.
Article Google Scholar
Wood, L., Martin, K., Christian, H., Nathan, A., Lauritsen, C., Houghton, S., ... & McCune, S. (2015). The pet factor-companion animals as a conduit for getting to know people, friendship formation and social support.PloS one,10(4), e0122085.
Wu, J., Ma, P., & Xie, K. L. (2017). In sharing economy we trust: the effects of host attributes on short-term rental purchases. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(11), 29622976.
Article Google Scholar
Xiao, Y., Wang, H. H., & Li, J. (2021). A new market for pet food in China: online consumer preferences and consumption. The Chinese Economy, 54(6), 430440.
Article Google Scholar
Xue, R., Luo, X., & Zhu, L. (2022). A statistical survey on the consumption of pet food in China. Statistics and Applications., 11(3), 1423.
Google Scholar
Yu, Y., & Kim, H. S. (2019). Online retailers return policy and prefactual thinking: an exploratory study of USA and China e-commerce markets. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 23(4), 504518.
Article Google Scholar